Clinton PLANT & CIA Operative Behind ‘Benghazi YouTube Video’ Lie Is Source of Russian Hacking Lies

ELDER PATRIOT – Thanks to the diligence of investigative reporter Aaron Klein Hillary Clinton’s ties to the CIA’s former acting director Mike Morell has been exposed. 

Morell left the CIA suddenly to take a job at Beacon Global Strategies immediately after his phony excuse blaming the attacks on our embassy and compound in Benghazi on a YouTube video were proven false.  Remember, UN Ambassador Susan Rice appearing on 5 Sunday news shows parroting the lie verbatim on each?

The CIA specializes in propaganda, misinformation and disinformation so this should come as a shock to no one.  In fact, the CIA was established for exactly these purposes.

As we chronicled yesterday the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities reported that:

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.”

The CIA was formed to twist information for political reasons though that was supposed to be limited to foreign interventions.  It’s now clear at least a certain number of CIA operatives have expanded operations within America’s borders.

Beacon Global Strategies’ managing director is longtime Clinton aide Phillippe Reines.  Reines served under Clinton at the State Department in a number of capacities that included Communications Advisor as well as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Strategic Communications.

It is from that platform that Morell launched the phony Russian hacking narrative for the purpose of undermining the election of Donald Trump.

Morell planted the narrative with “journalists” on the CIA payroll at the Washington Post and the New York Times and it gained traction from there. 

Whether those who ran with the story after that are on the CIA’s payroll is yet to be determined but the purpose of creating a narrative that Clinton’s supporters would latch onto has been achieved.  And the left-wing echo chamber began relentlessly repeating the phony narrative just as they did following the phony Benghazi narrative. 

Breitbart cites these examples of just how pervasive the CIA’s control over the MSM is:

“Former Acting CIA Director Calls Russian Interference In Election ‘The Political Equivalent Of 9/11,’” reads a Huffington Post headline.

Business Insider ran a piece similarly titled, “Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell: Russian meddling in US election ‘is the political equivalent of 9/11.’”

“Ex-CIA Director: Obama Should Retaliate To Russian Election Hacks Now,” blasted a headline.

Morell’s quotes were cited by USA Today, the Independent and scores of other publications.”

Idaho Democrat Frank Church who chaired the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities and who the committee came to be named after warned us:

“I don’t ever want to see this country go across the bridge.  I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America.  And we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss.  That’s the abyss from which there is no return.”

It’s scary to contemplate just how close we came to crossing that abyss in the last election.

Thank God that Hillary Clinton’s and Barack Obama’s political careers have been terminated by Donald Trump.  Now Trump can start the task of rebuilding Americans’ confidence in our government.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’