AWM| Criminals will do anything t launch a horrible crime. On November 22nd, around 8:40pm, a man posed as a UPS delivery driver, and when the Houston home owner opened the door, three other criminals carrying guns, followed him inside the house. In an event that turned out to be a violent robbery, the start of the incident was captured on a security camera that was installed outside the entrance of the home.

The footage unveils the man who is dressed in a full UPS uniform, as he approaches the door with a package in hand. After he rings the door bell, it is evident that the resident opens the door because three other men appear from the other side of the house with guns, as they push their way into the home.

According to a police report, the man who opened the door was assaulted with a pistol and while a gun shot had gone off, there were no signs of anyone being struck. After the man was transported to the hospital, he was diagnosed as having severe head and neck injuries. There were also two women and children in the house while the incident took place, however; they acted fast and gathered the children and locked themselves in closets, where they were safe.

The criminals ended up stealing a few pieces of jewelry and some collectible firearms before they escaped the home and fled. The four men have still not been caught and police are urging home owners in the area to be aware of anyone who approaches their door.

And while police are still on the hunt for the criminals, they are also trying to figure out how the man gained access to the authentic UPS jacket. “We’re still trying to understand how the suspect gained access to that jacket. UPS is fully cooperating,” Houston Police Department Sgt. Tony Mora said. “Their full-time employees are the ones who are normally issued that jacket.”

UPS issued a statement admitting that they are aware of the situation and they are cooperating with the Houston Police Department. “We appreciate the public’s trust extended to our delivery personnel and hope the perpetrator is quickly apprehended and brought to justice,” said a spokesperson from UPS. They also went on to tell the public that if they are concerned about the validity of their UPS driver, then they should ask them for identification. Or, if they would like to be extra cautious, then they can ask for the package to be left at the door. Packages do not have to be signed for unless they specifically designated that the package be signed for upon delivery.

Also, UPS ensured that they have an online service known as UPS My Choice, where they can follow their packages and confirm delivery times. That way, if an unexpected package and driver arrives at their door, then something may not be right and they can act accordingly. Or customers can opt to pick up their packages at a local parcel store.

Anyone with information on the incident is urged to contact the HPD Robbery Division at 713-308-0700.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’