Where ASSAD GOT HIS POISON GAS FROM Is Now CONFIRMED … & The Trail LEADS RIGHT BACK TO HILLARY!

USA POLITICS TODAY| Crooked Hillary has done a lot of terrible things in her life, but now we know just how far she’s willing to go to ruin America — and the world.

According to Seymour Hersh, investigative journalist, Barack Obama consistently lied about EVERYTHING involving Syria, for the past eight years. And, in fact, was covering up a major error Hillary Clinton made while she was secretary of state.

Hillary Clinton made the choice to collect Libyan weapons of mass destruction and send them to Syria. In other words: Hillary is directly responsible for Syria having sarin gas in their country. (via Strategic Culture).


This plan was part of Barack Obama’s obsession to replace President Assad in Syria. His long-standing desire for a regime change led him to give the nod to Hillary in regard to the sarin gas.

The plan was basically to frame President Assad — by planting gas-based weaponry in his country, knowing he would eventually use it, and break the international ban. Hillary, warmonger that she is, WANTED to start an unending battle between the country and the United States.

This, of course, leads back to Hillary’s desire to go to war with Russia, as Russia is currently allied with Syria. An attack on Syria would undoubtedly cause President Putin of Russia to retaliate against the United States.

Hillary was a treasonous liar and a secret keeper about many things, but, even during her campaign, she couldn’t keep her lust for war with Russia to herself. We the People have known for months now that she was itching to start a fight, at any cost, and justify it with ANY flimsy excuse.

Russian “hacking” was just Plan B after her initial plan of framing Syria’s president seemingly failed. Yet, her ultimate goal has always remained the same.

Of course, former president Barack Obama knew this all along. According to Hersh: “There’s no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel.”

Naturally, Seymour Hersh had to report these findings via alternative media. As did Christof Lehmann, who had similar findings. Both had gone directly to the mainstream media when they made their horrific discoveries, but no press would publish what they’d found. It didn’t fit the liberal narrative.

No mainstream media outlet would touch this story. It would RUIN the Democrats for years! If the American public knew that the United States president and his secretary of state were in cahoots to frame a foreign leader — by giving him dangerous chemical weapons — then the public would be in an outrage. And rightfully so!

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’