Leaked Emails Show Hillary Refused To Share Plane With Black Woman

VIA| Every time a Republican didn’t embrace President Barack Obama or his White House with unalloyed joy, they were accused of being a racist. However, when it’s Hillary or Bill Clinton opposing the Obamas, the press simply stayed silent.

Most of the mainstream media is continuing to do so after an email obtained by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch proved that Hillary Clinton didn’t want to fly on the same plane as Michelle Obama.

According to a Judicial Watch press release, the document was part of “2,078 pages of documents revealing more instances of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sending and receiving classified information via an unsecured email server.

“They also show Clinton’s daughter Chelsea and others involved with the Clinton Foundation receiving special favors from Huma Abedin, the former secretary’s deputy chief of staff,” the group said.

While that may have been the big reveal, the one email of interest in this case was Clinton’s discussion with Abedin over a July 2011 trip to the funeral of former first lady Betty Ford, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

“Looks like plane won’t be an issue,” Abedin wrote. “Also, looks like Michelle Obama also going.”

That’s when things took a turn…

“Is it ok (sic) that we and Mrs. O take two separate planes?” Clinton responded.

“I think it’s ok (sic). But let me see what kind of plane she’s taking,” Abedin said.

“I would rather have our own of course,” Clinton continued.

Now, I’d like to point out that on Wednesday, Clinton told a conference in California that it would be “really stupid” to throw out the Paris Agreement on climate change, according to Recode.

She said that “(f)or the United States to throw our lot in with the very, very small number of countries that have turned their backs on climate change, is not only a breach of an agreement … but part of what keeps us going is that America’s word is good and you stand with your prior administration, whether it was of your party or not.”

Now, here’s a woman who said she believes the Paris Agreement is sacrosanct because it protects the environment. Yet, what did she do when she may have had to fly on the same plane as Michelle Obama during her time as secretary of state? She demanded another one.

This says nothing of the fact that Clinton snubbed Michelle Obama by refusing to fly with her. If this were Donald Trump, we would be talking about the racist move that he made. In Clinton’s case, however, the email has mostly been let slide by the media, who doesn’t feel that it’s even worth covering.

Clinton is a hypocrite of a grand magnitude. She talks about the bigotry of Republicans and how they don’t care about global warming, yet she decides to fly to California on another jet than Michelle Obama. And the press is nowhere to be found.

The press may be willing to go to bat for her, but America realized just how hypocritical she was. That’s why she didn’t get elected.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’