ELDER PATRIOT – As if on cue from Hillary Clinton or President Obama, George Soros’ Black Lives Matter army began killing Dallas police officers in a coordinated and well-planned attack last night.  So far five officers are dead, another seven have been wounded, and two bystanders as well.  And, just like that James Comey, Hillary Clinton, and her emails are gone from the news cycle, wiped from the public consciousness.

The Obama Administration no longer attempts to camouflage their actions as the events of the past week illustrate.  They’re either convinced we’re stupid or they just don’t care what we think any longer. 

From Godfather Bill Clinton’s law-breaking meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, to Hillary Clinton publicly bribing Lynch with the promise of on-going employment, to FBI Director James Comey ignoring a century old law, Obama and his staffers now operate with wanton disregard for the rule of law.

The news surrounding the presumed Democratic nominee was becoming too damaging – the one poll taken solely after Comey’s decision showed Trump now leading Clinton by 2 points – rendering wasted the twenty-six million dollars in negative advertising against Donald Trump that the Clinton campaign had spent in June.

Obama knew something was needed to reclaim the narrative after House Republicans exposed the FBI Director yesterday in what appeared to be a complete evisceration of his assertions delivered during his Tuesday morning statement.  The longer discussions of Hillary’s emails dominated the headlines the further she was sinking in the polls.

That is why the timing of last night’s massacre of Dallas police and the military orchestration with which it was executed suggests Obama called in a favor from his allies within and without the Black Lives Matter community.

Yesterday Google twittered this from their official account:   

Screen Shot 2016-07-08 at 4.46.52 PM

Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt is an ardent Obama supporter with their relationship having been consummated after Obama recognized Google’s immense power to influence political debate through their ability to control the flow of information.

A discussion of how Google is able to accomplish this can be found here.

Once Obama understood Google’s immense power to influence the political debate the president forged an alliance with Schmidt and Google.

The president accomplished this by ignoring the recommendation of his own FTC staffers who supported bringing a lawsuit against Google for abusive trade practices. 

The president even went so far as to provide Google access to an FCC report before it was released to the public.  That resulted in 15 pages of policy being stricken because Google executives didn’t like their content.

Even more evidence of Obama’s willingness to accommodate Google in order to gain their favor surfaced when Obama overrode FCC chairman Tom Wheeler on “net neutrality” regulations at the behest of Schmidt.

In return, as researchers for information supportive of alternative news stories who use Google can tell you, the search engine has used their algorithms to bury stories negative to the administration, and to elevate stories, no matter how specious or unimportant, that may be deemed damaging to this administration’s enemies.

So the stage was set for the social justice warriors last night and with the most incredible timing (sarcasm) Black Lives Matter shooters were dispatched to kill police officers and clear this morning’s headlines of Comey, Hillary and her emails.  What better than to bring front and center to the American public another chance to advance the Clinton-Obama gun control and racial injustice arguments?

So who funds the increasingly militarized BLM movement?  According to Politico it’s “some of the biggest donors on the left.”  Democratic financial heavyweights that include Tom Steyer, Paul Egerman, Steve Phillips, Susan Sandler, Rob McKay and George Soros.

Phillips acknowledged the funding was for “shutting down freeways and disrupting rallies.”  And they were not disappointed when BLM activists consistently delivered on “disrupting rallies” by bringing violence wherever and whenever Donald Trump appeared.

Coincidentally, Black Lives Matter shut down a California freeway as part of last night’s disruptive actions.

What these donors knew but chose to ignore was the fierce independent nature of the BLM movement and a team of BLM assassins in Dallas unleashed Hell on innocent human beings in a hateful, terrorist action.  This forces us to ask the question, why is it we always find the left playing cozy with and funding the terrorists who kill Americans?

Some BLM leaders had met with Obama in December of 2014 but after meeting with President Obama’s Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett as guests at the White House last September leaders of the BLM movement seemed emboldened and became decidedly more intimidating, militant and violent.

Last night Obama’s personal domestic terror wing sprung into action and five law-enforcement officers are dead.  Apparently, whether in Benghazi or Dallas, leftists believe that funding terrorists, both here and abroad, and the death that is causes it Americans is a reasonable price to pay to advance their agenda.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’