CNN ‘Blacklisted’ From White House – More Outlets To Follow

ELDER PATRIOT – Trump’s actions of past week have made it clear that he believes his electoral victory was over the liberally biased purveyors of fake news, the Mainstream Establishment Media (MSEM) more so than over Hillary Clinton.

People who have followed Trump over the years knows he never was interested in a political career but, as he told Oprah in 1988, if America needed him he would answer the call.

Oprah:  “This sounds like political presidential talk to me.  I know people talk to you about whether or not you want to run would you would you ever?”

Trump:  I Probably wouldn’t do it but I do get tired of seeing what’s happening with this country and if got so bad I would never want to rule it out totally because I really am tired of seeing what’s happening with this country, how we’re really making other people live like kings and we’re not.”

So when 16 feckless Republicans who had been willing participants in selling out the interests of We the People, and the most corrupt, venal, vicious, treacherous person ever to hold political office became the clear choice for the Democrats, Trump knew he could no longer sit on the sidelines.

America needed him and he put his money where his heart is and funded his own campaign.

The MSEM was his best friend while he dismissed his Republican competition in short order.  The MSEM was confident that they had cleared the path to the White House for the first presidential vagina by helping the nominee they thought the weakest to win the Republican nomination.  Then they turned on Trump.

The MSEM resorted to the most disingenuous reporting ever disseminated by supposedly reputable news outlets.  When the facts favored Trump the MSEM resorted to creating fake news.

It became clear that Trump’s greatest opponent wasn’t Hillary Clinton, it was the MSEM that pulled out all the stops to protect her from her scandalous past while anxiously reporting as fact any political operative who came forward to accuse Trump of anything without checking the veracity of the claim or of the claimant.

The MSEM’s reporting had been so over the top that Trump, along with the rest of us, realized that they were the greatest threat to our Democracy, our continued freedoms and any return to prosperity that we might hope for.

So in his first press conference last week, Trump being a man of action, immediate action, let one of the worst offenders CNN know that he wouldn’t be taking their questions for a while.  When they persisted Trump shut them up calling them fake news.

The MSEM is crying fascism but that’s only because the plan Trump is floating will strip them of the filter that they have used to make previous Republican president cower.

Trump isn’t banning them from briefings and press conferences, which is what a fascist would do and what they want you to believe he is doing.  Instead, he’s expanding the pressroom from 49 seats to accommodate 400 media members.

Trump recognizes that the strength of a democracy is derived from a robust media voicing diverse opinions so that the people can make informed decisions rather than the monolithic left-wing reporting that the MSEM has devolved into.

Trump will be granting access to members of the new media, conservative talk radio, and the so-called alt-right media, as well as the same members of the MSEM as usual, to the White House pressroom to create a fair and balanced accounting of his administration.

This has members of the MSEM panicking.  Their failure to drag Hillary Clinton across the finish line already stood as evidence of their diminished influence.  With the truthful media now in the room they can only become less influential diminishing their ability to drive the Globalists’ agenda.

That’s why Kellyanne Conway followed up Sean Spicer’s deliberate tweaking of the MSEM yesterday with this admonition of NBS’s Chuck Todd today, “Chuck, if we’re going to keep referring to our press secretary in those types of terms, I think we are going to have to rethink our relationship here. I want a great open relationship with our press.”

It’s a long overdue reset of the media’s biased influence that had brought us to the edge of losing our Constitutional government. 

It’s one more thing we have Donald Trump to thank for.

HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. . . Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. . . Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” . . Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. . . Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. . . “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” . . Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. . . The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” . . But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? . . At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. . . “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: . . For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. . . However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. . . A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” . . However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . . -Obama’s Iran nuke deal -Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server -Obama IRS targets conservatives -Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters -Obamacare & Obama’s false promises -Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order -Benghazi-gate -Operation Fast & Furious -5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl -Extortion 17 -‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session -Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval -Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law -Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act -Illegally conducting war against Libya -NSA: Spying on Americans -Muslim Brotherhood ties -Miriam Carey -Birth certificate -Executive orders -Solyndra and the lost $535 million -Egypt -Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress -Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers -Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’